In common law systems that rely on witness testimony, a guiding question is one that suggests the specific answer or contains the information that the examiner wants to confirm.  Their use in court to obtain evidence is restricted to reduce the examiner`s ability to direct or influence the evidence presented. Depending on the circumstances, key questions may be offensive or appropriate.  GUIDING QUESTION, Evidence, Practice. A question that puts the words to repeat in the mouth of the witness or clearly suggests the answer that the party wants to receive from him. 7 Serg. and Rawle, 171; 4 towers. 247. In this case, the examiner must guide him to the answer. It is not always easy to determine what is a key issue and what is not.
2. These questions cannot generally be put to a witness during his or her examination-in-chief. 6 binn. R. 483, 3 Binn. R. 130; 1 phill. Ev. 221; 1 Strong. Ev.
123. But in a trial, questions may be asked in order to guide the mind of the witness towards the object of the investigation; and they are permitted if it appears that the witness intends to conceal the truth or favour the opposing party, or if, by the nature of the case, the mind of the witness cannot be directed to the object of the investigation without that object being expressly specified. 1 warehouse. No. 43; 1 Strong. about 100. 3. In cross-examination, the examiner generally has the right to ask key questions. 1 Strong. Ev. 132; 3 puppy. Pr.
892; Rosc. Civ. Ev. 94; 3 bouv. Inst. Nr. 3203-4. Below you will find an overview of the most important issues, what they are and when they are admitted in court proceedings. Key question: „Mr. Smith`s car was driving 20 miles over the speed limit when he lost control of his vehicle and crashed into the victim`s car, right? (He leads the witness to conclude that Mr. Smith was driving too fast and consequently lost control of his vehicle, resulting in the accident for which he was clearly responsible.) Although Rule 611(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence (and similar rules in many states) do not prohibit the introduction of questions for onward transfer, some states have explicitly restricted the use of guidance questions for onward transfer. In practice, it is at the discretion of the court of first instance which key questions can be asked during the transfer.
In general, orientation questions are permitted more generously in the transfer in order to provide a basis and to draw the witness`s attention to certain statements raised during cross-examination. In addition, during transfer, an interrogator will often ask questions specifically aimed at determining whether a conclusion drawn from the cross-examination is correct. While these types of questions are likely to result in a „yes” or „no” answer, they are correctly understood as direct questions, not guiding questions, and are admissible. By encouraging witnesses to simply agree, leading questions skew the answers. Key questions are those that are put to a witness in court by a lawyer. In practice, judges sometimes allow policy questions for direct examination of friendly witnesses in relation to preliminary matters that are necessary to provide context or context and are not contested; For example, employing or training a witness. Key issues may also be admitted during direct examination if a witness needs special treatment, such as a child. However, the court must ensure that the lawyer conducting the investigation does not supervise the witness by means of orientation questions. Finally, they allow avocados to cut quickly to paint a clearer picture of what a person has seen. If they reject each other, the witness must answer the question, while arguing means that the lawyer must rephrase the question or move on. But the question „And then you saw a red car, right?” is a guiding question.
1) v. Abbreviation for „lead the witness”, in which the lawyer asks questions during a trial or testimony in a form in which he puts words in the mouth of the witness or proposes the answer. It is inappropriate to lead when the lawyer is questioning a witness who is called by that lawyer and who is presumably friendly with the lawyer. Therefore, counsel for the opposing party will object that a question is „suggestive” and, if so, the judge will uphold the objection and prohibit the question in that form. However, leading questions are admissible when a witness is cross-examined by the other party or if it is established that the witness is hostile or hostile to the position of the lawyer conducting the examination. 2) adj. Reference to a question from a witness suggesting the answer. Key questions can also be used to create perceptions by not allowing a witness to qualify their answer.
For example, in the above exchange, the witness may want to testify that the weapon was stolen from the accused prior to the murder, but since this question was not asked, the witness could not give this precise answer, which left some perceptions in the mind of a jury. As you can see, an experienced lawyer can use leading questions to get a witness to confirm the lawyer`s words. In fact, it allows the lawyer to testify indirectly through the witness, which can be very effective. When a lawyer or someone else suggests answers to the witness in the form of a question, this is called directing the witness. Non-guiding and guiding questions show strong differences in comparison. n. A question asked of a witness by a lawyer at a hearing or testimony (sworn examination outside court), offers an answer or puts words in the witness`s mouth. Such an issue is often contested, usually with the simple objection: „direct”. A key question is admissible only if, during cross-examination (possibility of examination for direct testimony), it is addressed to the opposing party to the dispute or to an „opposing witness”, as such a witness can easily reject the proposed wording.
If a party names an enemy witness – the opposing party or a witness identified with the opposing party – leading questions may be used in the direct examination of such a witness.